Associations with Prehospital Antibiotic Receipt among Combat Casualties with Open Wounds: A Department of Defense Trauma Registry Study.

INTRODUCTION: Current Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) guidelines recommend antibiotic administration for all open wounds to prevent infection. We identified associations between demographics, procedures, and medicines with the receipt of prehospital antibiotics among combat casualties. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used a series of emergency department procedure codes to identify adult subjects within the Department of Defense Trauma Registry from January 2007 to August 2016 who sustained open wounds. We compared demographics, procedures, and medicines administered among casualties receiving prehospital wound prophylaxis versus casualties not receiving antibiotic prophylaxis. We controlled for confounders with multivariable logistical regression. RESULTS: We identified 18,366 encounters meeting inclusion criteria. Antibiotic recipients (n = 2384) were comparable to nonrecipients (n = 15,982) with regard to age and sex. Antibiotic recipients were more likely to sustain injuries from firearms and undergo all procedures examined related to hemorrhage control, airway management, pneumothorax treatment, and volume replacement except for intraosseous access. Antibiotic recipients were less likely to sustain injuries from explosives. Antibiotic recipients had a modestly higher survival than nonrecipients (97.4% versus 96.0%). Associations with prehospital antibiotic receipt in multivariable logistic regression included non-North Atlantic Treaty Organization military force affiliation (odds ratio (OR) 4.65, 95% CI, 1.0-20.8), tachycardia (OR 3.4, 95% CI, 1.1-10.5), intubation (OR 2.0, 95% CI, 1.1-3.8), and administration of tranexamic acid (OR 5.6, 95% CI, 1.2-26.5). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of combat casualties with open wounds receiving prehospital antibiotics was low despite published recommendations for early antibiotics in patients with open wounds. These findings highlight the ongoing need for additional educational and quality assurance initiatives to continue improving adherence to TCCC guidelines with regard to prehospital antibiotic administration. Future studies are necessary to determine reasons for suboptimal TCCC guideline compliance.

3D-Printed Tourniquets Used at the Battlefront in Ukraine: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: The war in Ukraine urged a need for prompt deliv- erance and resupply of tourniquets to the front. Producing tour- niquets near the battlefront was a feasible option with respect to resupply and cost. METHODS: A locally produced 3D-printed tourniquet (Ukrainian model) from the "Tech Against Tanks" charity was tested against commercially available and Committee of Tactical Combat Casualty Care (CoTCCC)- recommended tourniquets (C-A-T™ and SOF™TT-W). We tested how well the tourniquets could hold pressure for up to 2 hours. RESULTS: A Kruskal-Wallis test revealed significant differences between the groups (p<.05). Post-hoc testing revealed a signif- icant difference between the C-A-T and the Ukrainian tourni- quet (p=.004). A similar significance was not found between the SOF™TT-W Wide and the Ukrainian model (p=.08). Dis- cussion: The Ukrainian model can hold pressure as well as the commercially available tourniquets. There is much value if this can be produced close to the battlefield. Factors including lo- gistics, cost, and self-sufficiency are important during wartime. CONCLUSION: We found that our sample of 3D-printed tourni- quets, currently used in the war in Ukraine, could maintain pressure as well as the commercially available tourniquets. In- deed, our tests demonstrated that it could maintain a signifi- cantly higher pressure.

The last days: The medical response of United States and allied military teams during the Afghanistan Exodus.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to describe the United States and allied military medical response during the withdrawal from Afghanistan. BACKGROUND: The military withdrawal from Afghanistan concluded with severe hostilities resulting in numerous civilian and military casualties. The clinical care provided by coalition forces capitalized on decades of lessons learned and enabled unprecedented accomplishments. METHODS: In this retrospective, observational analysis, casualty numbers, and operative information was collected and reported from military medical assets in Kabul, Afghanistan. The continuum of medical care and the trauma system, from the point of injury back to the United States was captured and described. RESULTS: Prior to a large suicide bombing resulting in a mass casualty event, the international medical teams managed distinct 45 trauma incidents involving nearly 200 combat and non-combat civilian and military patients over the preceding 3 months. Military medical personnel treated 63 casualties from the Kabul airport suicide attack and performed 15 trauma operations. US air transport teams evacuated 37 patients within 15 hours of the attack. CONCLUSION: Lessons learned from the last 20 years of combat casualty care were successfully implemented during the culmination of the Afghanistan conflict. Ultimately, the effort, teamwork, and system adaptability exemplify not only the attitudes and character of service members who provide modern combat casualty care but also the paramount importance of the battlefield learning health care system. A continued posture to maintain military surgical preparedness in unique environments remain crucial as the US military prepares for the future.Retrospective observational analysis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level V.

Adopting a culture of remote damage control resuscitation in the military: Insights from the Israel defense forces decade of experience.

BACKGROUND: Remote damage control resuscitation (RDCR) aims to apply the principles of damage control resuscitation to prehospital and austere care, emphasizing early control of compressible hemorrhage, balanced volume resuscitation, and the prevention or correction of coagulopathy, acidosis, hypothermia, and hypocalcemia. Over the past decades, the Israel Defense Forces Medical Corps (IDF-MC) has made significant efforts to integrate the principles of RDCR into prehospital trauma care in the military. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In this article, we reflect on the implementation of RDCR in the prehospital setting by the IDF-MC, sharing successes, challenges, considerations on guideline changes, and their assessment over time. RESULTS: The implementation of RDCR has resulted in changes in clinical practice guidelines and training programs, with increased awareness and adoption of RDCR principles among both medical and non-medical military personnel. The implementation of these principles and adherence to guideline changes have been analyzed using the Israel Defense Forces Trauma Registry. DISCUSSION: By sharing our experiences, we hope to provide valuable insights for other military and civilian organizations seeking to adopt similar protocols for prehospital care. Continuous evaluation and refinement of guidelines and training programs will be essential for ongoing implementation and advancement of RDCR in the prehospital setting.

External Hemorrhage Control Techniques for Human Space Exploration: Lessons from the Battlefield.

The past few decades of military experience have brought major advances in the prehospital care of patients with trauma. A focus on early hemorrhage control with aggressive use of tourniquets and hemostatic gauze is now generally accepted. This narrative literature review aims to discuss external hemorrhage control and the applicability of military concepts in space exploration. In space, environmental hazards, spacesuit removal, and limited crew training could cause significant time delays in providing initial trauma care. Cardiovascular and hematological adaptations to the microgravity environment are likely to reduce the ability to compensate, and resources for advanced resuscitation are limited. Any unscheduled emergency evacuation requires a patient to don a spacesuit, involves exposure to high G-forces upon re-entry into Earth's atmosphere, and costs a significant amount of time until a definitive care facility is reached. As a result, early hemorrhage control in space is critical. Safe implementation of hemostatic dressings and tourniquets seems feasible, but adequate training will be essential, and tourniquets are preferably converted to other methods of hemostasis in case of a prolonged medical evacuation. Other emerging approaches such as early tranexamic acid administration and more advanced techniques have shown promising results as well. For future exploration missions to the Moon and Mars, when evacuation is not possible, we look into what training or assistance tools would be helpful in managing the bleed at the point of injury.

Optimising aerial military medical evacuation dispatching decisions via operations research techniques.

Senior military leaders and medical practitioners continuously seek new ways to improve the performance and organisation of deployed medical evacuation (MEDEVAC) systems to minimise mortality rates of combat casualties. The objective of this paper is to highlight how recent research in the fields of operations research and machine learning can be leveraged to better inform the implementation and modification of current and future MEDEVAC tactics, techniques and procedures for combat operations in a deployed environment. More specifically, this paper discusses state-of-the-art techniques that optimise the management of MEDEVAC assets prior to and during combat operations. These recent research efforts emphasise that military healthcare administrators should contribute to and extend the evolving portfolio of research that seeks to design and develop decision support systems leveraging artificial intelligence and operations research to improve MEDEVAC system performance.

Ten-year reduction in thoracic injury-related mortality among Israel Defense Forces soldiers.

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to describe injury patterns, prehospital interventions and mortality rates of combat-related thoracic injuries during the past decade among Israel Defense Forces (IDF) soldiers before and after implementation of the 2012 IDF-Military Corps 'My Brother's Keeper' plan which included the publication of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for thoracic injuries, emphasis on adequate torso protection, introduction of modern life-saving procedures and encouragement of rapid evacuation. METHODS: The IDF prehospital trauma registry was reviewed to identify all patients who sustained thoracic injuries from January 2006 to December 2017. IDF soldiers who were injured, died of wounds or killed in action (KIA) were included. These were cross-referenced with the Israel National Trauma Registry. The periods before and after the plan were compared. RESULTS: 458 (12.3%) of 3733 IDF soldiers wounded on the battlefield sustained combat-related thoracic injuries. The overall mortality was 44.3% before the CPG and 17.3% after (p<0.001). Most were KIA: 97% (95 of 98) died by 30 June 2012, and 83% (20 of 24) after (p<0.001). Casualties treated with needle thoracostomy before and after CPG were 6.3% and 18.3%, respectively (p=0.002). More tube thoracostomies were performed after June 2012 (16.1% vs 5.4%, p=0.001). Evacuation was faster after June 2012 (119.4 min vs 560.8 min, p<0.001), but the rates of casualties evacuated within 60 min were similar (21.1% vs 25%, p=0.617). CONCLUSIONS: Among military casualties with thoracic injuries, the rate of life-saving interventions increased, evacuation time decreased and mortality dropped following the implementation of My Brother's Keeper plan.

A Quantitative and Qualitative Literature Analysis of the Orthopedic Surgeons' Experience: Reflecting on 20 Years in the Global War on Terror.

INTRODUCTION: After over 20 years of war in the Middle East, orthopedic injuries have been among the most prevalent combat-related injuries, accounting for 14% of all surgical procedures at Role 2/3 (R2/R3) facilities according to the DoD Trauma Registry. To further delineate the role of the deployed orthopedic surgeon on the modern battlefield, a retrospective review was performed highlighting both quantitative and qualitative analysis factors associated with orthopedic surgical care during the war in the Middle East. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of orthopedic surgeons in the Middle East from 2001 to 2021. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the PubMed and Embase databases using a two-reviewer strategy. Articles were compiled and reviewed using Covidence. Inclusion criteria included journal articles focusing on orthopedic injuries sustained during the Global War on Terror (GWoT) in an adult U.S. Military population. In the event of a conflict, a third author would determine the relevance of the article. For the remaining articles, a full-text review was conducted to extract relevant predetermined quantitative data, and the Delphi consensus method was then utilized to highlight relevant qualitative themes. RESULTS: The initial search yielded 1,226 potentially relevant articles. In all, 40 studies ultimately met the eligibility criteria. With the consultation of previously deployed orthopedic surgeons at the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, a retrospective thematic analysis of the 40 studies revealed five themes encompassing the orthopedic surgeons experience throughout GWoT. These themes include unique mechanisms of orthopedic injury compared to previous war injuries due to novel weaponry, differences in interventions depending on R2 versus R3 locations, differences in injuries from those seen in civilian settings, the maintained emphasis on humanitarian aspect of an orthopedic surgeon's mission, and lastly relation of pre-deployment training to perceived deployed success of the orthopedic surgeons. From this extensive review, we found that explosive mechanisms of injury were greatly increased when compared to previous conflicts and were the etiology for the majority of orthopedic injuries sustained. With the increase of complex explosive injuries in the setting of improved body armor and overall survival, R2/3 facilities showed an increased demand for orthopedic intervention including debridement, amputations, and external fixation. Combat injuries sustained during the GWoT differ in the complications, management, and complexity when compared to civilian trauma. "Humanitarian" cases made up a significant number of operative cases for the deployed orthopedic surgeon. Lastly, heterogeneous training opportunities were available prior to deployment (fellowship, combat extremity surgical courses, and dedicated pre-deployment training), and the most commonly identified useful training was learning additional soft-tissue coverage techniques. CONCLUSION: These major themes indicate an emphasis on pre-deployment training and the strategic positioning of orthopedic surgeons to reflect the changing landscape of musculoskeletal trauma care. Moving forward, these authors recommend analyzing the comfort and perceived capability of orthopedic surgeons in these unique military environments to best prepare for a changing operational format and the possibility of future peer-peer conflicts that will likely lead to a lack of medical evacuation and prolonged field care.

Management and outcomes of military penetrating neck injuries: An eleven-year retrospective case note review.

INTRODUCTION: Penetrating Neck Injuries (PNIs) affected 3.2% of trauma patients attending US and UK deployed medical treatment facilities (MTFs) during the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts. Injured military personnel requiring aeromedical evacuation for such injuries were managed at the Royal Centre for Defence Medicine (RCDM), Birmingham, UK. The aim of this paper was to review the management of PNI in both deployed MTFs and when evacuated back to the UK. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective case note review was performed of all military patients who sustained PNI whilst on deployment overseas, and who were subsequently evacuated to RCDM between March 2003 and December 2014. RESULTS: Forty casualties who sustained PNI were identified, of which 28/40 (70%) sustained injury from explosive fragmentation, and 11/40 (28%) from gunshot wounds. Hard signs of PNI were present in 3/40 (7.5%) patients, soft signs in 14/40 (35%), no signs in 12/40 (30%), and unknown signs in 11/40 (28%) patients. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) was used in 39/40 (98%) patients, and was effective at ruling out significant injury, with 100% (29/29) of casualties with a negative CTA not developing vascular or aerodigestive injury. There were 9/29 (31%) patients who had surgical neck exploration despite both a negative CTA and absence of hard signs of PNI. There were 12/40 (30%) patients who required operative intervention at RCDM. CONCLUSION: UK military surgeons in Role 3 MTFs had a low threshold for surgical exploration, even in the absence of CT findings or hard signs. This was likely due to the high-energy mechanisms responsible for military PNI, in addition to the limited availability of equipment and clinical expertise in visualising the larynx.

Where Do We Stand on "Buddy Transfusion" During Military Operations?

Warm fresh whole-blood transfusion between comrades on the battlefield, also known as "buddy transfusion," has been thrust back into the limelight for several years now. It means drawing blood on the battlefield, once a bleeding soldier needs a transfusion, from one of their uninjured companions and immediately infusing it. It is a lifesaving procedure, effective and hardy. This work aims to answer the main questions that military caregivers might have about it: interest of this procedure, donor and recipient safety, and hemostatic capacity of the blood collected this way.

Airway and Hypothermia Prevention: and Treatment via STEAM The System for Thermogenic Emergency Airway Management.

Military medicine has made significant advancements in decreasing mortality by addressing the lethal triad - metabolic acidosis, coagulopathy, and hypothermia. However, casualties are still succumbing to injury. Recent conflict zones have led to the development of remarkable life-saving innovations, including the management of compressible hemorrhage and whole blood transfusions. Nevertheless, hypothermia prevention and treatment techniques remain relatively unchanged. Hypothermia prevention is anticipated to become more critical in future operations due to a predicted increase in evacuation times and reliance on Prolonged Casualty Care (PCC). This is likely secondary to increasingly distanced battlespaces and the mobility challenges of operating in semi-/non-permissive environments. Innovation is essential to combat this threat via active airway rewarming in the vulnerable patient. Thus, we propose the development, fabrication, and efficacy testing of a device in which we estimate being able to control temperature and humidity at physiologic levels in the PCC setting and beyond.

Building a sustainable Mil-Civ partnership to ensure a ready medical force: A single partnership site's experience.

ABSTRACT: One of the challenges in military medicine is ensuring that the medical force deployed to the theater of combat operations is prepared to perform life, limb, and eyesight saving care at a level of care comparable to our top civilian Level I trauma centers. There is increasingly more evidence demonstrating that the majority of military physicians are not exposed to trauma or combat casualty care-relevant surgical cases on a consistent basis in their daily practice at their garrison military treatment facility (MTF). To prevent this widening skills and experience gap from become more of a reality, the 2017 National Defense Authorization Act called for the expansion of military and civilian (Mil-Civ) medical partnerships, working toward embedding military medical providers and surgical teams in busy civilian trauma centers. Vanderbilt University Medical Center is one of the busiest trauma centers in the country and being in close proximity to the local MTF at Fort Campbell, KY, it is primed to become one of the premier Mil-Civ partnerships. Creating a strategy that builds the partnership in a calculated and stepwise fashion through multiple avenues with centralized leadership has resulted in the early success of the program. However, Vanderbilt University Medical Center is not immune to challenges similar to those at other Mil-Civ partnerships, but only by sharing best practices can we continue to make progress.

Battlefield pain summit 2022: Expert consensus statements.

BACKGROUND: Battlefield pain occurs in combat casualties who experience multiple severe injuries. The nature of battlefield scenarios requires a distinct approach to battlefield pain research. A battlefield pain summit was thus convened to identify shortcomings in the current understanding of battlefield pain management, review the current state of battlefield pain research, and shape the direction of future research. METHODS: On January 10 to 11, 2022, a hybrid in-person and virtual meeting hosted by the US Army Institute of Surgical Research defined research priorities for the Combat Casualty Care Research Program's Battlefield Pain research portfolio. Summit participants identified the following key focus areas under the umbrella of battlefield pain research: battlefield injury patterns; use of ketamine and nonopioid analgesics; analgesic delivery systems; the impact of analgesia on performance, cognition, and survival; training methods; battlefield regional anesthesia; and research models. Preliminary statements presented during the summit were refined and rank ordered through a Delphi process. RESULTS: Consensus was achieved on 7 statements addressing ideal analgesic properties, delivery systems, operational performance concerns, and pain training. Ketamine was identified as safe and effective for battlefield use, and further research into nonopioid analgesics represented a high priority. CONCLUSION: The 7 consensus statements that emerged from this battlefield pain summit serve as a template to define the near-term research priorities for military-specific battlefield pain research.

El servicio de transfusión del ejército republicano durante la Guerra Civil Española y su influencia en Gran Bretaña en la Segunda Guerra Mundial / The blood transfusion service of the republican army during the Spanish Civil War and its influence in Great Britain in World War II

Al final de la Primera Guerra Mundial, el valor de la transfusión sanguínea era ampliamente reconocido, pero no fue hasta la Guerra Civil Española (1936-1939) cuando se crearon grandes organizaciones civiles de donantes de sangre para proporcionar sangre conservada (citratada) para la transfusión en pacientes civiles y militares en ambos bandos. Se desarrollaron técnicas de transfusión indirecta para administrar esta sangre, con instrumental de fácil manejo, capaz de ser llevado a cabo en cualquier lugar y por cualquiera con experiencia en la administración de inyecciones endovenosas. También se establecieron sistemas eficaces de transporte y distribución, a fin de abastecer adecuadamente las instalaciones sanitarias que prestaban servicio en los frentes de batalla en movimiento. Este trabajo pionero permitió la creación, por primera vez en la historia, de servicios militares de transfusión de sangre. Si bien este fue el caso tanto de las fuerzas insurgentes (nacionalistas) como del Gobierno republicano español, es este último el que constituye el foco de estudio aquí. Esto es posible gracias a las publicaciones del hematólogo catalán Frederic Duran Jordà, creador y director del Servicio Republicano de Transfusión de Sangre, que detallan las técnicas y procedimientos desarrollados durante la guerra para la recogida, análisis, distribución y transfusión de sangre. Esta información se amplía, especialmente con respecto a la aplicación práctica de la transfusión en primera línea, gracias a diferentes publicaciones del Dr. Reginald Saxton, voluntario británico integrado en la Sanidad Militar de la Republica. Es nuestra intención demostrar que las autoridades británicas se beneficiaron de la experiencia española en vísperas del estallido de la Segunda Guerra Mundial en 1939. Les ayudó a desarrollar planes para los servicios de transfusión que resultarían cruciales en el tratamiento de bajas civiles y militares durante la contienda. Frederic Duran Jordà y Reginald Saxton fueron asesores clave, junto con otros que regresaban de España, incluyendo a la reconocida hematóloga británica, Janet Vaughan. Además, los principios desarrollados en España (1936-39) para la práctica militar de transfusiones de sangre siguen respaldando las medidas actuales de reanimación de heridos en el campo de batalla.

By the end of the First World War, the value of blood transfusion was widely recognized, but it was not until the Spanish Civil War (1936-1939) that large civilian blood donor organizations were created to provide preserved (citrated) blood for transfusion, for both civilian and military patients. Indirect transfusion techniques were developed to administer this blood, with easy-to-use instruments, capable of being carried out anywhere and by any medical personnel with experience in the administration of intravenous injections. Efficient transportation and distribution systems were also established in order to adequately supply the sanitary facilities that served the moving battle fronts. This pioneering work enabled the creation, for the first time in history, of military blood transfusion services. While this was the case for both the insurgent (Nationalist) forces and those of the Spanish Republican Government, it is the latter that forms the focus of this particular study. This is made possible by the publications of Catalan hematologist Frederic Duran Jordà, creator and director of the Republican Blood Transfusion Service, who details the techniques and procedures developed during the war for the collection, testing, distribution and transfusion of blood. Further insight - especially with regard to the practical application of front-line transfusion - can be gleaned from the various writings of Dr Reginald Saxton, British volunteer with the Republican Sanidad Militar. It is the intention, here, to demonstrate that the British authorities benefitted greatly from the Spanish experience in the development of plans for transfusion services that would prove crucial in treating civilian and military casualties during World War II (1939-1945). Frederic Duran Jordà, and Reginald Saxton were key advisers, together with others returning from Spain, including renowned British hematologist, Janet Vaughan. Moreover, the principles developed in Spain (1936-39) for delivery of military blood transfusion practice still support current measures in battlefield casualty resuscitation.

Determining resuscitation outcomes in combat casualties: Design of the Deployed Hemostatic Emergency Resuscitation of Traumatic Exsanguinating Shock (Deployed HEROES) study.

BACKGROUND: During the course of the recent conflicts, the recommendations for resuscitation practices have evolved, but there has been no comprehensive comparative effectiveness study of these resuscitation strategies. The objective of this study was to describe the development and study design of the Deployed Hemostatic Emergency Resuscitation of Traumatic Exsanguinating Shock (Deployed HEROES) study-the first comprehensive analysis of military resuscitation practices in the deployed environment from October 2001 to October 2019. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study uses the Department of Defense Trauma Registry, Armed Services Blood Program database, and Military Trauma Mortality Review, while abstractors will use Theater Medical Data Store and Web Interface Patient Records to collect transfusion timing data. This study includes patients, who received blood products or died before receiving blood, treated at US military medical treatment facilities. The primary endpoints are survival at 6 hours, 24 hours, and 30 days postinjury. Secondary outcomes include infection, renal dysfunction, pulmonary dysfunction, and thromboembolic event. Exposure will be defined by blood product transfusion. Study groups will be frequency matched. Cox proportional hazards will compare patients who received warm fresh whole blood, low titer type-O whole blood, or only component therapy, while using adjustment for type of blood product transfused as a time-dependent covariate. Multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression will determine the effect of incompatible plasma in low titer type-O whole blood. RESULTS: An analysis plan for the Deployed HEROES study was developed with the aim of minimizing bias. CONCLUSION: This study will inform the optimal resuscitation strategies, which will potentially have a substantial impact on combat mortality. If whole blood is found to be the optimal transfusion strategy, this finding will be crucial in future operating environments involving dispersed medical assets. These results will provide critical information necessary for combat casualty care guidelines. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and epidemiological; Level III.

Analgesia and Sedation for Tactical Combat Casualty Care: TCCC Proposed Change 21-02.

Analgesia in the military prehospital setting is one of the most essential elements of caring for casualties wounded in combat. The goals of casualty care is to expedite the delivery of life-saving interventions, preserve tactical conditions, and prevent morbidity and mortality. The Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) Triple Option Analgesia guideline provided a simplified approach to analgesia in the prehospital combat setting using the options of combat medication pack, oral transmucosal fentanyl, or ketamine. This review will address the following issues related to analgesia on the battlefield: 1. The development of additional pain management strategies. 2. Recommended changes to dosing strategies of medications such as ketamine. 3. Recognition of the tiers within TCCC and guidelines for higher-level providers to use a wider range of analgesia and sedation techniques. 4. An option for sedation in casualties that require procedures. This review also acknowledges the next step of care: Prolonged Casualty Care (PCC). Specific questions addressed in this update include: 1) What additional analgesic options are appropriate for combat casualties? 2) What is the optimal dose of ketamine? 3) What sedation regimen is appropriate for combat casualties?

[Long-term results of dental implantation in military personnel]. / Otdalennye rezul'taty dental'noi implantatsii u voennosluzhashchikh.

BACKGROUND: Currently, the use of the dental implantation method for the medical service of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation is quite new. The method of dental implantation makes it possible to eliminate defects in the dentition of military personnel and other contingents eligible for medical care in military medical institutions of the Ministry of Defense of Russia. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to substantiate the medical effectiveness of the use of dental implantation in military healthcare. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted on the basis of the Department of Maxillofacial Surgery and Surgical Dentistry of the Military Medical Academy named after S.M. Kirov. The study is based on the analysis of long-term results of dental implantation according to medical histories and outpatient records. The study was conducted in 3 stages: stage 1 - study of the medical histories of patients who underwent dental implantation; stage 2 - examination of patients with dental implants and analysis of long-term results; stage 3 - a patient questionnaire was conducted to determine the effectiveness of dental implantation. RESULTS: The structure of complications during dental implantation was revealed. Clinical examples of long-term results of prosthetics using dental implants are presented. It has been established that due to the peculiarity of military service and the remoteness of the locations of military units from the military medical organization, it is not always possible to conduct regular medical examinations and examinations of patients. To identify early symptoms of peri-implantitis, which is more often asymptomatic, preventive examinations of military personnel should be carried out 1-2 times a year. CONCLUSION: To increase the service life of an orthopedic structure with installed dental implants, regular preventive examinations of patients to identify pathological processes are important. In favor of implantation, there is a choice for some categories of military personnel. This is especially important for flight and naval personnel, since dentures installed on dental implants are the only way to preserve their professional suitability in the military accounting specialty. The presence of teeth and the absence of removable dentures is an important requirement when performing combat missions.

Communicable diseases in humanitarian operations and disasters.

Military organisations have battled communicable disease for millennia. They have pioneered disease prevention from the Crusades to the World Wars and continue to do so today. Predeployment vaccinations and chemoprophylaxis are effective in preventing communicable disease, as is reliable vector destruction and bite prevention, especially in the era of multidrug resistant organisms. These measures are unlikely to be fully possible in disasters, but reactive vaccination and efforts to reduce exposure to communicable disease should be a priority. Communicable diseases can be challenging to diagnose-the UK Defence Medical Services have become familiar with tools such as multiplex PCR and mass spectrometry. These have the potential to accurately identify organisms and sensitivity patterns in austere environments. Management of communicable diseases depends on accurate diagnosis and has a largely well-established evidence base but can be limited by a lack of resources and skills in an austere setting, therefore telemedicine can assist diagnosis and treatment of infections by projecting specialist skill. Systems such as EpiNATO2 are useful in monitoring diseases and identifying trends in order to establish control measures. Many of these tools and techniques are effective in austere environments and offer learning opportunities for those providing care in similar settings. Further research is ongoing into diagnostic tools as well as remote management.

The Damage Control Resuscitation and Surgical Team: The New French Paradigm for Management of Combat Casualties.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this work was to introduce the new French forward resuscitation and surgical unit. It's also to discuss the choices and waivers granted to fit the tactical context of modern conflicts and the current epidemiology of combat casualties. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multidisciplinary task force of 11 people proceeded to the conception and the creation of a new military resuscitation and surgical unit. The preliminary work included a scoping review of the combat casualties' epidemiology in modern conflicts and an analysis of the recent French medical-surgical treatment facilities lessons learned. In April 2019, a technical-operational evaluation was conducted to confirm all the technical, ergonomic, and organizational choices made during the design phase. RESULTS: The multidisciplinary task force resulted in the creation of the Damage Control Resuscitation and Surgical Team (DCRST). The DCRST focused on the resuscitation strategy, including transfusion of blood products, and the life-saving surgical procedures to be performed as close as possible to the point of injury. It was designed for the resuscitation of two patients: the life-saving surgery of two patients and the very short-term intensive care (<12 hours) of four patients at the same time. The DCRST provided sufficient autonomy to provide take care of four T1 and four T2 or T3 casualties per day for 48 hours. It was armed with 23 soldiers. The technical equipment represented 5,300 kg and 27 m3. All the technical medical equipment could be stored in two 20-foot containers. CONCLUSION: The DCRST represents a new paradigm in medical support of French military operations. It offers the advantage of two combat casualties' surgical management at the same time, as close as possible to the combat zone. It responds to a 2-fold epidemiological and logistical challenge.

Whole blood at the tip of the spear: A retrospective cohort analysis of warm fresh whole blood resuscitation versus component therapy in severely injured combat casualties.

BACKGROUND: Death from uncontrolled hemorrhage occurs rapidly, particularly among combat casualties. The US military has used warm fresh whole blood during combat operations owing to clinical and operational exigencies, but published outcomes data are limited. We compared early mortality between casualties who received warm fresh whole blood versus no warm fresh whole blood. METHODS: Casualties injured in Afghanistan from 2008 to 2014 who received ≥2 red blood cell containing units were reviewed using records from the Joint Trauma System Role 2 Database. The primary outcome was 6-hour mortality. Patients who received red blood cells solely from component therapy were categorized as the non-warm fresh whole blood group. Non- warm fresh whole blood patients were frequency-matched to warm fresh whole blood patients on identical strata by injury type, patient affiliation, tourniquet use, prehospital transfusion, and average hourly unit red blood cell transfusion rates, creating clinically unique strata. Multilevel mixed effects logistic regression adjusted for the matching, immortal time bias, and other covariates. RESULTS: The 1,105 study patients (221 warm fresh whole blood, 884 non-warm fresh whole blood) were classified into 29 unique clinical strata. The adjusted odds ratio of 6-hour mortality was 0.27 (95% confidence interval 0.13-0.58) for the warm fresh whole blood versus non-warm fresh whole blood group. The reduction in mortality increased in magnitude (odds ratio = 0.15, P = .024) among the subgroup of 422 patients with complete data allowing adjustment for seven additional covariates. There was a dose-dependent effect of warm fresh whole blood, with patients receiving higher warm fresh whole blood dose (>33% of red blood cell-containing units) having significantly lower mortality versus the non-warm fresh whole blood group. CONCLUSION: Warm fresh whole blood resuscitation was associated with a significant reduction in 6-hour mortality versus non-warm fresh whole blood in combat casualties, with a dose-dependent effect. These findings support warm fresh whole blood use for hemorrhage control as well as expanded study in military and civilian trauma settings.